Survival of the Fittest

Author: Jan Dalton

Grade Level: Grade Ten (English 13)

Project Description: Upon reading the novel Deathwatch by Robb White, students will compare and contrast the two main characters, the young guide Ben and the big game hunter Madec. They will analyze each character's strengths and weaknesses, look for similarities and differences, and display their findings in the form of a concept map. (This project is part of a unit plan based on this novel.)

Outcomes
Student Task
Journal Rubric
Character Comparison Rubric
Resources

TLT Projects Page
Teaching and Learning with Technology

 

 

 

Outcomes:

ICT Outcomes:

C.6: Students will use technology to investigate and/or solve problems.

C.7: Students will use electronic research techniques to construct personal knowledge and meaning.

 

ELA Outcomes:

Writing:

2. Appropriate organization and development of meaning are essential qualities of written composition

4. A writer¹s ideas and experiences can be presented through various modes of discourse

Reading/Literature:

6. Reading is a process that demands active involvement of the reader

9. Human experience and values can be explored through literature

10. The understanding and appreciation of a literary selection is dependent upon the recognition and understanding of the general characteristics of literary forms and the relationship of form, idea and purpose

11. Locating, selecting and evaluating written materials, frequently required to fulfill one's purpose in reading, are important life skills

Viewing:

14. Elements in and structure of the image strongly influence the total effect of the communication

 


Student Task:

Background: Aaaahhhhh - the sweet smell of success! Money, power, fame, glory ... what does success mean to you? Is it the things listed above, or you looking for more intangible things such as happiness, love, peace, contentment? In the novel Deathwatch, success meant a favourable outcome in a life or death struggle.

The two main characters were both strong men in very different ways and they pit their minds, bodies and characters against one another in an attempt to survive a hunting trip gone wrong. Your job is to compare and contrast these strengths, and to display your comparison in the form of a concept map using the software program Inspiration.

At first glance, this may appear to be a classic comparison of "good versus evil" ­ but is it really so clear cut? You may be surprised to find many similarities between these characters.

Activities:

A template is available to get you started. You are expected to use the "levels" feature of the software to compare the characters on the basis of different viewpoints (physical strength, mental toughness, strength of character, etc.)

 


Journal Rubric:

     
Exemplary
4
Entries are thoughtful and wording carefully crafted. Student has made strong connections, demonstrated proficiency in analyzing characters¹ motivations. Has completed more than the minimum number of expected entries.    
Very Good
3
Entries are complete and generally well-written. Student has attempted to make connections and to analyze characters¹ motivations. Has completed the minimum number of expected entries.    
Developing
2
Most entries follow the format given. Student has attempted to make some connections. With assistance, has demonstrated efforts to analyze characters¹ motivations. Has completed slightly less than the minimum number of expected entries.    
Awareness Evident
1
Entries are confusing and difficult to understand. Student unable to make connections without assistance and is reluctant to work independently. Journal is incomplete; minimal effort observed.    

 

 

Character Comparison Rubric:

Information/Comparisons (Content) Concept Map  
Exemplary
4
Organizes material in a clear, appropriate, and precise manner. Evidence of making inferences to draw conclusions about characters, Makes sophisticated comparisons between characters on several levels. Uses multiple graphics or pictures per level that related to the categories. Includes hotlinks if appropriate. Carefully chooses color of text and backgrounds for good contrast. Controls colors and shapes of links and concept nodes. Demonstrates proper construction of levels.  
Very Good
3
Organizes material in an appropriate fashion, and presents basic information on more than one level. Makes connections between the two characters and identifies both similarities and differences. Used one or two graphics or pictures per level that related to the text. Controls color of text and/or background. No difficulty reading text due to color contrast. Construction of more than one level is evident.  
Developing
2
Organizes most material, but may lack some clarity or consistency. Presents some basic information but may have extraneous material. Makes some comparisons between characters on more than one level. Graphics and pictures used are unrelated to the text. Color selections make it difficult to read text. Difficulties encountered in construction of levels.  
Awareness Evident
1
Little evidence of a cohesive plan; little or no description or detail. Ideas seem scrambled, jumbled, or disconnected. Unable to find areas of similarities/differences between characters independently. No use of graphics or pictures. No attempt to use color. No attempt made to construct more than one level.  

 

 

Resources: